Today
Sigg announced that in fact the lining they had used in their bottles was not
BPA Free. But, they advised today that their NEW bottles are in fact
BPA Free. Seems a little late, you think? The twitter world and mommy community is in a bit of an uproar as
Sigg has all along stood behind their bottles as the choice for
BPA free bottle alternative.
As quoted on
ZRecommends:
Consumer groups have been alleging since at least 2007 that SIGG bottles are lined with a BPA-containing epoxy, and on the face of it the claim makes sense - SIGG bottles are aluminum, after all, the same material used in canned foods, infant formula, and soda that have been second-class citizens in the debate over BPA exposure. SIGG, in turn, maintained that their bottles did not leach BPA, but that they could not disclose the formula for the liner because it was made by someone else.I don't know about you, but I feel cheated and betrayed. Although, they now claim to be free of
BPA it sure seems like they took their time to tell everyone. Seems like a long enough cycle to sell off any of their existing stock before they introduce the new product, what do you think?
Bottles affected were sold before August 2008 and have a brassy lining similar to the lining in a can of tomatoes. The new
BPA free bottles have a dull, beige colored liner. More information can be found in the following articles.
ZRecommendsThe Soft LandingThx, JP